Re: (9.1) btree_gist support for searching on "not equals"

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: (9.1) btree_gist support for searching on "not equals"
Date: 2010-08-03 19:16:00
Message-ID: AANLkTikDGEr7p8H7NFAF3Mbi-p5k3M69L+4twPdHoN7t@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 12:27 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I was also wondering if it would be worth adding some additional
>> regression testing to contrib/btree_gist exercising this new
>> functionality.  Thoughts?
>
> Sure. I attached two tests.

Committed. I renamed the test to "not_equals" rather than "mixed" and
added an "EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)" in there to verify that the index is
actually being used. (I might have to remove that if it turns out not
to be stable between an index scan and a bitmap index scan, but let's
see what the buildfarm says.)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-08-03 19:16:25 Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output
Previous Message Yeb Havinga 2010-08-03 19:05:58 Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance