From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Londiste |
Date: | 2010-05-26 19:56:45 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikCIdzfHBH2p2HDpkXDA6J1xWqwCaVWTF8En0Ly@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Francisco Reyes wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian writes:
>>
>> > Well, I assumed "Londiste" head reached the level that we should mention
>> > it, but you are right on the floodgates issue. We do aleady mention
>> > many other replication solutions in other sections, so I didn't think
>>
>> Then perhaps all that is needed is to just link to the replication section
>> of the wiki:
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pool
>> ing
>>
>> A search for replication on the top of the doc page (ie
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/index.html) takes to the high
>> availability page, so a reference there to the wiki page may be a good idea.
>
> That is an excellent idea, not only for replication, but there are
> probably other wiki pages that we should link to from our main docs. I
> will go through the wiki, find appropriate pages, and add links from our
> docs.
I don't know that I'm eager to link from our docs to the wiki. That
seems likely to lead to maintenance headaches. But on the other hand,
I see no problem mentioning third-party products that are part of the
PG ecosystem.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | alvherre | 2010-05-26 20:03:12 | Re: Londiste |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-05-25 20:57:18 | Re: Londiste |