From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP) |
Date: | 2010-09-14 01:30:25 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikCE5kxTFxdHSHtVrX3SvMLhGfJjWMXhZgK9de8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Anyone working on JSON datatype?
If no, I'm going to submit simplified version of JSON datatype patch.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Joseph Adams
> <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Updated patch: the JSON code has all been moved into core, so this
>> patch is now for a built-in data type.
>
> I think the patch can be split into two pieces:
> 1. Basic I/O support for JSON type (in/out/validate)
> 2. JSONPath support and functions for partial node management
>
> It is better to submit only 1 at first. Of course we should consider
> about JSONPath before deciding the internal representation of JSON,
> but separated patches can be easily reviewed.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-09-14 02:02:24 | Re: Reducing walreceiver latency with a latch |
Previous Message | Rob Wultsch | 2010-09-14 01:06:56 | Re: update on global temporary and unlogged tables |