From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql |
Date: | 2011-02-06 14:10:15 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikBmihiJgvshEnU94eFsSc8xVKLiFg1axuwcyjX@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 08:15:30AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>> > 1. Add PLpgSQL_var.should_be_detoasted; check it in plpgsql_param_fetch().
>> > Essentially Pavel's original patch, only with the check logic moved up from
>> > exec_eval_datum() to plpgsql_param_fetch() to avoid bothering a couple other
>> > callers that would not benefit. ?Tom and Robert objected to the new bookkeeping.
>>
>> I don't understand why it's necessary. It seems to me that the case
>> we're concerned about is when someone is referencing a variable that
>> is toasted which they might later want to reference again. We're
>> going to have to notice that the value is toasted and detoast it
>> anyway before we can really do anything with it. So why can't we
>> arrange to overwrite the *source* of the data we're fetching with the
>> detoasted version?
>>
>> I know this is probably a stupid question, but i don't understand the
>> code well enough to see why this can't work.
>
> The detoast currently happens well after PL/pgSQL has handed off the datum.
> Consider this function, my original benchmark when reviewing this patch:
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f(runs int) RETURNS void LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$
> DECLARE
> foo text;
> BEGIN
> SELECT c INTO foo FROM t;
> FOR n IN 1 .. runs LOOP
> PERFORM foo < 'x';
> END LOOP;
> END
> $$;
>
> Suppose "foo" is toasted. As the code stands in master, it gets detoasted in
> text_lt(). Certainly we won't overwrite the source back in PL/pgSQL from the
> detoast point in text_lt().
Right, that much seems obvious...
> Pavel's optimization requires that we identify the
> need to detoast the datum earlier and do so preemptively.
I guess I need to look at the patch more. I'm failing to understand
why that can't be done within one or two functions, without passing
around a new piece of state.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2011-02-06 14:31:44 | Re: Add support for logging the current role |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-02-06 13:58:30 | Re: ALTER TYPE 2: skip already-provable no-work rewrites |