From: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psycopg and two phase commit |
Date: | 2010-11-04 16:46:28 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikASwK1PVOVqcgX3QCQohP5r5k2K2EcEm49PnY1@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello
>
> who is psycopg maintainer, please? Can somebody explains to me, why
> psycopg doesn't support twophase commit still, although some
> implementation was done in summer 2008?
Hello Pavel,
Just wanted to warn you that I have implemented the 2pc protocol in psycopg.
I have this and other patches ready to be merged in the trunk: more
details are available in
http://initd.org/psycopg/articles/2010/11/02/new-features-upcoming-psycopg-release/
I will try to have the patches released soon: definitely before the
PyCon. If you fancy some testing you are welcome.
Best regards,
-- Daniele
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2010-11-04 17:07:58 | Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-11-04 16:13:04 | Re: Alter column to type serial |