Re: OCLASS_FOREIGN_TABLE support is incomplete

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Err... wait.  Actually, I think the right thing to do might be to
>> remove OCLASS_FOREIGN_TABLE altogether.  I don't think it's actually
>> used for anything.  For a foreign table, we use OCLASS_CLASS, just as
>> we do for indexes and sequences.  I think that's just leftover crap
>> that I failed to rip out.
>
> OK.  I'll fix it as part of the extensions patch, since it's touching
> all those same places anyway.

Excellent, thanks!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company