From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: security label support, revised |
Date: | 2010-09-28 11:53:34 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTik3kwnu2hSH1t6MB4WkuxBoi-rbpP=kOGkZJFwf@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 13:50, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Shigeru HANADA
> <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:07:33 -0400
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I found and fixed a few more issues and committed this. The pg_dump
>>> support had a few escaping bugs, and I added tab completion support
>>> for psql. Considering the size of the patch, it seems likely that
>>> there are some issues we both overlooked, but this is as solid as I
>>> can make it for right now.
>> Some OIDs used in SECURITY LABEL patch have already been used for
>> some functions such as pg_stat_get_xact_numscans().
>>
>> The src/include/catalog/duplicate_oids script reports that 3037 ~
>> 3040 are used two or more times.
>>
>> Though all regression tests finish successfully, should this be
>> fixed ?
>
> Woops. Thanks for the report, fixed. I wish we had a regression test
> that would catch these mistakes. It's easy to forget to run this
> script.
Could we run the script as part of the regression tests? :-)
Or if not, could we have the buildfarm run it?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-09-28 12:03:06 | Re: security label support, revised |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-28 11:50:16 | Re: security label support, revised |