From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: new compiler warnings |
Date: | 2011-01-26 22:40:28 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTik2Xt6zNdV715rrG_=cNY_QH4V7K9u1WPu1Dq0k@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On ons, 2011-01-26 at 17:00 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> More to the point, regardless of whether the warning is reasonable or
>> not, there's tangible value in a warning-free build, which we have had
>> on most of the systems I use until recently.
>
> I don't disagree that the warnings are valid. I'd just like to see them
> as well.
>
> It turns out you need -Wformat-security with newer GCC versions. We
> might want to add that to the standard options set.
>
> Anyway: Fixed.
Thanks!
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-01-26 22:41:39 | Re: .gitignore patch for coverage builds |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-26 22:39:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers |