Re: PostgreSQL 8.2.3

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jason <jason(dot)friess(at)lmco(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.2.3
Date: 2010-11-10 18:06:11
Message-ID: AANLkTik266M-zmrjdo37pByJ+-R20f8SbQtwNHwwmGh=@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10 November 2010 17:30, Jason <jason(dot)friess(at)lmco(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> Yes - we're aware that there are newer versions of PostgreSQL out there.  If
> it were completely up to us we would be using 8.2.18 or even 8.4.  The
> problem is - we need to install on a network that has a rather involved
> approval process for all software tools that are introduced.  8.2.3 was
> previously approved.  Getting a newer version of PostgreSQL approved would
> probably take time that we do not have given the time-critical nature of our
> effort.

It's pretty obvious to all of us that what you're doing is far riskier
than just upgrading to 8.2.18, and makes absolutely no sense. There
are no behavioural differences between 8.2.3 and 8.2.18. We are
*extremely* conservative and disciplined about release management, so
that users don''t have to worry about this stuff.

--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-10 18:16:10 Re: PostgreSQL 8.2.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-10 17:54:35 Re: Problem with to_tsquery() after restore on PostgreSQL 9.0.1