Re: Fw: patch for pg_ctl.c to add windows service start-type

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Quan Zongliang <quanzongliang(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fw: patch for pg_ctl.c to add windows service start-type
Date: 2010-09-30 08:12:15
Message-ID: AANLkTik1bKo_YRkO1bW6mKnsBkfXSRVFROWejYrR8oqn@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 04:40, Itagaki Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi, I have a question about the latest patch.
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Quan Zongliang
> <quanzongliang(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> New patch attached. How about this?
>>> I don't see us ever using anything other than auto or demand. The
>>> others aren't for "regular services"
>
> + set_starttype(char *starttypeopt)
> + {
> +       if (strcmp(starttypeopt, "a") == 0 || strcmp(starttypeopt, "auto") == 0)
> +               pgctl_start_type = SERVICE_AUTO_START;
> +       else if (strcmp(starttypeopt, "d") == 0 || strcmp(starttypeopt,
> "demand") == 0)
> +               pgctl_start_type = SERVICE_DEMAND_START;
>
> It accepts only "a" and "auto" for auto, but "au" or "aut" are rejected.
> Is is an intended behavior?  I think we can use prefix match here because
> we use the logic in some places. For example,

I think it's modeled on what we allow for the "-m" parameter, and ISTM
it's good to keep those consistent.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2010-09-30 08:12:48 Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-09-30 08:02:14 wip: for-in-array patch