From: | Aleksey Tsalolikhin <atsaloli(dot)tech(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ERROR: cache lookup failed for type 14237017 |
Date: | 2010-09-21 21:30:15 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTik0Nfyw+1QV7nD5z6GtkrF92w9AvitHYfgibTJb@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Jens Wilke <jens(at)wilke(dot)org> wrote:
> On Dienstag, 21. September 2010, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
>> Yesterday, I had twelve thousand "cache lookup failed for type N"
>> messages, like this:
>
>> What does "type 14237017" mean?
>
> pg_type oid
Dear Jens,
I am trying to understand your reply.
pg_type is a catalog of data types:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/catalog-pg-type.html
An OID is a key to system table:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/datatype-oid.html
I guess it's used to identify a row in a system table.
So PostgreSQL was trying to lookup a row in a system table and did
not find it in a cache.
>> What cache are we talking about?
>
> Did you alter a type before?
No. I don't even know how to alter a type.
> There's a bug in postgres, that prevents the plan cache to be
> invalidated on type changes. We ran into this bug as well on 8.4.4.
Is there a bug id or a URL for the bug, please? I'd like to study the
bug description to
understand it better.
Sincerely,
Aleksey
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jens Wilke | 2010-09-21 22:10:21 | Re: ERROR: cache lookup failed for type 14237017 |
Previous Message | Dmitriy Igrishin | 2010-09-21 21:19:06 | Re: versioned pl/pgsql functions |