From: | MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
Date: | 2011-03-18 15:52:18 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTik058OfhS-xEcNSJdGhcxS4sbntPQdKj9cLQY2g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> wrote:
> Their documentation [1] isn't entirely clear on that first: "the master
> blocks after the commit is done and waits until at least one
> semisynchronous slave acknowledges that it has received all events for
> the transaction" and the "slave acknowledges receipt of a transaction's
> events only after the events have been written to its relay log and
> flushed to disk".
>
> But then continues to say that "[the master is] waiting for
> acknowledgment from a slave after having performed a commit", so this
> indeed sounds like the transaction is visible to other sessions before
> the slave ACKs.
Yes, their docs are not clear on this.
--
Mark Callaghan
mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | MARK CALLAGHAN | 2011-03-18 16:03:03 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-03-18 15:47:46 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-03-18 15:58:44 | Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19 |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-03-18 15:47:46 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |