| From: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi, depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net |
| Subject: | Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered |
| Date: | 2011-01-22 07:41:23 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTik0=tJQLDQ7w8OEG2txg0Hntf1-fQn_Pr6WYdZe@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2011/1/21 Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>:
> On Jan21, 2011, at 03:29 , Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>>>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> Oh, you mean water that had some things you didn't want taken out
>>>> of it?
>>
>>> Right -- God only knows the number of things were filtered out to
>>> leave me with filtered water. What's "filtered" in this case is what
>>> was passed through, not what was removed.
>>
>> I think it's pretty common to use the phrase "filtered out" to identify
>> the stuff that gets removed by the filter, as opposed to what gets
>> through. So we could possibly use "Rows Filtered Out: nnn". I still
>> think that's more awkward than "Rows Removed: nnn" though.
>
> "Rows Skipped: nnn", maybe?
+1. Very straightforward to me.
Regards,
--
Hitoshi Harada
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vladimir Kokovic | 2011-01-22 07:46:34 | pg_test_fsync problem |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2011-01-22 06:30:32 | Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers |