From: | pasman pasmański <pasman(dot)p(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | compare languages |
Date: | 2011-02-08 10:35:29 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTik=FXz_4BQrn=KWzdi3SUpTuK_RmhALgtsAerps@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi.
I do small test of plsql and perl.Result is that perl may be
2xfaster in simple loops.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION _.test1() RETURNS void AS
$BODY$
declare i integer; j bigint := 0;
begin
for i in 1..1000000 loop j:=j+i; end loop;
end;
$BODY$ LANGUAGE plpgsql VOLATILE COST 100;
"Result (cost=0.00..0.26 rows=1 width=0) (actual
time=1382.851..1382.853 rows=1 loops=1)"
"Total runtime: 1383.167 ms"
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION _.test2() RETURNS void AS
$BODY$
$j=0;
for($i=0;$i<1000000;$i++) {
$j = $j + $i;
}
$BODY$ LANGUAGE plperlu VOLATILE COST 100;
"Result (cost=0.00..0.26 rows=1 width=0) (actual
time=584.272..584.275 rows=1 loops=1)"
"Total runtime: 584.355 ms"
------------
pasman
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-02-08 10:45:52 | Re: compare languages |
Previous Message | Jakub Ouhrabka | 2011-02-08 08:41:12 | Re: Write-heavy pg_stats_collector on mostly idle server |