From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: why two dashes in extension load files |
Date: | 2011-02-15 04:38:22 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=zyCMp5s2cbbaK79Qd-5Bj=ns1shsBYW2U-Rx0@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Are we deparsing the names of the SQL files to infer the set of
>> version numbers we have to worry about? It seems to me that if
>> there's a list of known version numbers somewhere, we can use dash as
>> the separator without any special restricton.
>
> The list of known version numbers is inferred from the available files,
> not vice versa. IMO that's a feature not a bug. A manually maintained
> list would just be one more thing to forget to update.
I could go either way on that one; I was just throwing it up against
the wall to see whether it would stick.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-02-15 04:39:00 | Re: pl/python do not delete function arguments |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-15 04:31:08 | Re: ALTER TYPE 2: skip already-provable no-work rewrites |