| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: getting set up on git (finally) |
| Date: | 2010-10-09 03:12:42 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=zvX=CZXJ4Xmrz+EACTvQxtELCM4r702E3Sfx_@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm finally trying to get current with the switch to git, following this
> wiki page:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Committing_with_Git
>
> Specifically, I am trying to do:
> ------------
> Dependent Clone per Branch, Pushing and Pulling From a Local Repository
> -plus-
> Clone Locally, Repoint Origin
> ------------
>
> In order to set this up, I used the attached recipe. Does that look
> reasonable and correct?
>
> I am hoping that from this point forward I can treat each of those
> checked out branches exactly (more-or-less) as I did under cvs -- true? E.g.
>
> #make some changes
> git commit -a
> git push
Looks fairly sane on a quick once-over.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-09 03:16:41 | Re: Total memory allocated to postgres |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-09 03:08:05 | Re: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific |