From: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown |
Date: | 2010-08-17 17:12:30 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=tEe=gaWGUVTMkZrmziKOsGi4b4R0v2Mn1vtk=@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/8/17 Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2010/8/17 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> 2010/8/16 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>>>> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>>> Unfortunely the current implementation of EXECUTE USING is not working
>>>>> this way.
>>>>
>>>> Uh ... what do you base that statement on?
>>
>>> About the planning behavior ?
>>> With USING, I get a seqscan (cost and long), without USING I have an
>>> indexscan(short and costless).
>>
>> It works as expected for me. What PG version are you using exactly?
>> Could you provide a self-contained example?
>
> postgresql 8.4.4. Yes I'll work one out this evening.
> more or less : table foo (uid char(32) PK, flag boolean), uids are
> md5sum. +-6M rows.
Here we are. A simple usecase.
--
Cédric Villemain 2ndQuadrant
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
usecase_exec_using.sql | application/octet-stream | 1.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-08-17 17:13:12 | Re: Progress indication prototype |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-08-17 17:12:23 | Re: Progress indication prototype |