From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19 |
Date: | 2011-03-21 01:05:48 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=sv3xF=nBWAM6DfcM3f86ZVhC_cJQC_CJ8+2ak@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2011-03-20 05:44, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, I'm not going to be able to reproduce this here, and my test
>> setup didn't show a clear regression. I can try beating on it some
>> more, but... Any chance you could rerun your test with the latest
>> master-branch code, and perhaps also with the patch I proposed
>> upthread to remove a branch from the section protection by
>> SyncRepLock? I can't really tell from reading the emails you linked
>> what was responsible for the slowdowns and speedups, and it is unclear
>> to me how much impact my recent changes actually had.
>
> No problem. Could you tell me the name of the "remove a branch from the
> section protection by SyncRepLock" ? patch, or perhaps a message-link?
> Upthread I see sync-standbys-defined-rearrangement.patch but also two
> sync-rep-wait-fixes.
Thanks! The things I'd like to see compared are:
- performance as of commit e148443ddd95cd29edf4cc1de6188eb9cee029c5
- performance as of current git master
- performance as of current git master with
sync-standbys-defined-rearrangement applied
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2011-03-21 01:47:18 | Re: pl/python tracebacks v2 |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-03-21 00:14:21 | Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC |