On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Vinubalaji Gopal <vinubalaji(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> already does this. I looked at the WAL parameters and the new async
> commit but not sure if I am looking at the right place. Say i have 10
> clients connecting and each client is inserting a record. I want to
>
You want the async commit. If you can detect and re-execute "lost"
transactions, it gives you the best of everything: defer disk I/O and
transaction boundaries are honored so you never have inconsistent data
after crash recovery.