| From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
| Date: | 2010-09-27 14:29:37 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=rs-DFK4KTFoVPcoSXQGjnOxY6BwK1b+5StQwN@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 18 July 2010 11:58, Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thom Brown wrote:
>
>> Okay, I just edited an existing dia file: pgclient_server.dia. All I
>> did was change the font size of the text "client application" at the
>> top of the diagram, and changed the properties of a line so the
>> arrowhead was no longer on the end. I used dia 0.97.1 to edit the
>> file. The result when saving is attached in the diff file. That's a
>> lot of file changes for what I did.
>>
>> Thom
>>
>
> Indeed.
>
> The only explanation I can find to this is that I used dia.0.96.1 to
> generate the file and you have used 0.97.1 to edit it.
>
> Almost all changes are to the attributes:
> <dia:rectangle val=....
> <dia:point val=....
>
> I suspect that these changes have been done because 'something' have
> changed between the two main versions in the way they deal with these
> attributes :(
Has anyone yet come up with a reliable and sensible format we can use?
Thom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2010-09-27 22:51:35 | Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2010-09-26 17:07:32 | Re: Additional index entries and table sorting |