From: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH] |
Date: | 2011-01-26 18:45:52 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=rZk8gWaneW=XWmey+HWUHvZbTHLULfq5Z_sO5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 15:48, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 13:04, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:52 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 5:14 AM, Alexey Klyukin wrote:
>>>
>>>> You mean packing both a string representation and a reference to a single SV * value?
>>>
>>> Dunno, I'm not a guts guy.
>>
>> Well, neither me (I haven't used much of the guts api there).
>
> Find attached a proof of concept that modifies Alexey's patch to do
> the above (using the overload example I and others posted).
[ ... ]
> Thoughts? Should I polish this a bit more? Or do we like the GUC better?
So its been over a week with no comments. ISTM there were more people
against adding yet another GUC. Barring objection ill finish the
missing parts of the POC patch I posted and submit that.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-01-26 18:47:56 | Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27 |
Previous Message | Richard Broersma | 2011-01-26 18:32:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers |