From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19 |
Date: | 2011-03-16 11:38:44 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=pkn1_T6twyKWcZ8yy0FZNFsLmspBYOcM_7hXZ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The problem is that there may be another backend B waiting on a lock
>> held by A. If backend A exits cleanly (without a PANIC), it will
>> remove itself from the ProcArray and release locks. That wakes up A,
>> which can now go do its thing. If the operating system is a bit on
>> the slow side delivering the signal to B, then the client to which B
>> is connected might manage to see a database state that shows the
>> transaction previous running in A as committed, even though that
>> transaction wasn't committed. That would stink, because the whole
>> point of having A hold onto locks until the standby ack'd the commit
>> was that no other transaction would see it as committed until it was
>> replicated.
>
> The lock can be released also when the transaction running in A is
> rollbacked. So I could not understand why the client wrongly always
> see the transaction as commtted even though it's not committed.
The transaction IS committed, but only locally.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-16 11:39:45 | Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19 |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-03-16 10:46:26 | Re: How should the waiting backends behave in sync rep? |