From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: git: uh-oh |
Date: | 2010-08-17 19:47:55 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=p-Yo9HqZ3MoiBqGKVBHfCJd6WBct3d2sTm6+h@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 21:35, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 17, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 21:28, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> The tip of every branch, and every single tag, all have the correct
>>>> data in them, but some revisions in between seem majorly confused.
>>>
>>> It seems to me that what we'll need to do here is write a script to
>>> look through the CVS history of each file and make sure that the
>>> versions of that file which appear on each branch match the revs in
>>> CVS in content, order, and the commit message associated with any
>>> changes. However, that's not going to do get done today.
>>
>> Yeah. Unless someone comes up with a good way to fix this, or even
>> better an explanation why it's actually ont broken and we're looking
>> at things wrong :D, I think we have no choice but aborting the
>> conversion for now and come back to it later.
>
>
> Can you post the cvs2svn command line used for conversion?
Sure:
cvs2git --options=/root/cvs2git.options
Attached is the options file.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
cvs2git.options | application/octet-stream | 27.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2010-08-17 19:52:05 | Re: git: uh-oh |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-17 19:43:01 | Re: git: uh-oh |