Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 14 September 2010 17:16, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I think a consensus needs to be reached on what you guys want
>>> changing.  Implementing changes isn't a problem, it's what changes
>>> should be implemented.  Whatever is decided, it needs to be easy to
>>> visually scan the page and its sections, clean and consistent.
>>
>> It seems like you're giving up just when we've just about got
>> consensus.  Please don't.
>
> No, not at all.  :)  I'm just suggesting that rather than people
> making a suggestion, and me going ahead and putting that change in
> straight away (like I have been doing), it should have the support of
> more than a single person first, otherwise there'll be lots of
> tweaking and un-tweaking without any real agreement.
>
> If you wish to go ahead with what we've currently got, I'll create
> another patch for Magnus to stage, otherwise what requires changing
> needs to be decided.

Oh, OK. Well, +1 for pushing live what's currently at:

http://pgweb.darkixion.com:8081/docs/8.4/static/sql-syntax-lexical.html

It's probably not perfect, but I think it's better than what we have
now, and that's sufficient. Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company