| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pierre Racine <Pierre(dot)Racine(at)sbf(dot)ulaval(dot)ca>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Dynamic binding in plpgsql function |
| Date: | 2011-03-02 15:05:23 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=iTDQyeUijCqrkquFjq7VMnVPbuF3PAsu91_3a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2011/3/2 Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> Lane...http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/improvise-callbacks-in-plpgsql-td2052928.html
>> (for whom nary a day goes by that I am not thankful for his tireless
>> efforts).
>
> Ahh, thanks to Tom Lane then !
> And thank you for the link of interesting topic from past :-)
yes...in the old days there was a lot more reason to do this because
there was no 'using' for execute and it was a lot more difficult to
coerce record types, arrays, etc into text format for passing. today,
I would probably use execute unless I already had C library in the
backend and was *really* concerned about speed.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pierre Racine | 2011-03-02 15:06:53 | Re: Dynamic binding in plpgsql function |
| Previous Message | Dmitriy Igrishin | 2011-03-02 14:54:14 | Re: Dynamic binding in plpgsql function |