Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Eric Davies <eric(at)barrodale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?
Date: 2010-11-23 18:28:25
Message-ID: AANLkTi=hgsgNALZ9B71UioMMYZu80v-UvRANqCe7DQJt@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Shigeru HANADA
<hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> I've separated the patch into tree parts.  They have codes, documents
> and tests within, and file_fdw and pgsql_fdw can be applied onto
> fdw_core for each, or together.  I hope the separation helps the
> review of the patches.  Contents of each patch are:
>
>  fdw_core : DDL for FDW HANDLER and FOREIGN TABLE, ForeignScan
>  file_fdw : FDW for file, as contrib (loadable) module
>  pgsql_fdw: FDW for PG, as contrib module

I think it would be useful to repost each of these on their own thread
and adjust the CF app to have an entry referring to each thread. That
way we can keep discussion and review for each one separate from the
others. Note that this thread is already totally off-topic anyway -
it started as a question about when SQL/MED would land and then it got
patches posted to it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-23 18:50:19 Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-11-23 18:22:02 Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?