Re: Performance of PostgreSQL over NFS

From: Rich <rhdyes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance of PostgreSQL over NFS
Date: 2010-12-21 20:31:37
Message-ID: AANLkTi=hBA=W=iqCfdNoaoPxhZw9pfZDVwLNUhVhjngW@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

I am wondering why anyone would do that? Too much overhead and no reliable
enough.

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>wrote:

> I was asked about performance of PostgreSQL on NetApp, the protocol should
> be NFSv3. Has anybody tried it? The database in question is a DW type, a
> bunch of documents indexed by Sphinx. Does anyone have any information?
> --
>
>
> Mladen Gogala Sr. Oracle DBA
> 1500 Broadway
> New York, NY 10036
> (212) 329-5251
> http://www.vmsinfo.com The Leader in Integrated Media Intelligence
> Solutions
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2010-12-21 21:07:13 Re: MySQL HandlerSocket - Is this possible in PG?
Previous Message Mladen Gogala 2010-12-21 19:28:46 Performance of PostgreSQL over NFS