Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> ... Well, the current CommitFest ends in one week, ...
>>>
>>> Really?  I thought the idea for the last CF of a development cycle was
>>> that it kept going till we'd dealt with everything.  Arbitrarily
>>> rejecting stuff we haven't dealt with doesn't seem fair.
>>
>> Uh, we did that with 8.4 and it was a disaster.  The CommitFest lasted
>> *five months*. We've been doing schedule-based CommitFests ever since
>> and it's worked much better.
>
> Rejecting stuff because we haven't gotten round to dealing with it in
> such a short period of time is a damn good way to limit the number of
> contributions we get. I don't believe we've agreed at any point that
> the last commitfest should be the same time length as the others

News to me.

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Development_Plan

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company