Re: Fwd: Extended query protocol and exact types matches.

2010/12/10 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>

> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > It would be quicker to answer my question and help than to teach me
> > the alphabet of communication. Although, thank you, and for that :-)
>
> It would be quicker still to ignore your email altogether, but I'm
> guessing you're not going to recommend that I take that approach.

Sure not !

> I
> did look briefly at whether I could also answer the question while I
> was replying, but found that I wasn't really sure what you were asking
> (which may be why no one else responded either).

I've got one useful respond before this post in general(at)(dot)

> To the best of my
> ability to determine what you were actually asking, it was something
> along the lines of "What will happen if I tell libpq that a parameter
> is a bigint when the server is expecting an int?". I don't happen to
> know the answer to that question without writing a 25-line program,
> compiling it, and testing it. Which wouldn't be very hard, but on the
> other hand it wouldn't be very hard for you to do it either. Best
> guess without testing? It'll work if the value is within the range
> that can be represented by an int and throw an error otherwise.
>
Yes, I've already investigated it, compiled and tested. The first line of
my initial post says: "To be assured and just for calmness.". :-)

> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

--
// Dmitriy.