Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, r t <pgsql(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index
Date: 2011-01-17 01:49:32
Message-ID: AANLkTi=eL5kjEUUrQNSYgnYxzoaha9PMAzLZOJxqUsqr@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca> wrote:
> I'm marking this as returned with feedback pending your answer on the
> possible memory leak above but I think the patch is very close to being
> ready.

Please use "Waiting on Author" if the patch is to be considered
further for this CommitFest, and "Returned with Feedback" only if it
will not be further considered for this CommitFest.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-01-17 01:50:49 Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-17 01:46:57 Re: limiting hint bit I/O