| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: string_to_array with an empty input string |
| Date: | 2010-08-12 07:03:03 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=dOQfRU6ngW0FX_WdtJrF75A91zh0d+6DXRGeg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/8/12 Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>:
>> I definitely agree that PL/pgsql could be more usable. Or if not,
>> then some other PL with a better overall design could be more usable.
>> I am not entirely sure how to create such a thing, however.
>
> Would the standard plpsm be just that? Pavel maintains a pg implémentation of it, I believe.
there isn't nothing about iteration over collections :(
Regards
Pavel
>
> Regards,
> --
> dim
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-08-12 09:02:32 | typos in HS source code comment |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-08-12 06:56:26 | Re: string_to_array with an empty input string |