Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by)

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 13:42, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I think forcing an initdb might be more trouble than this wart is worth.
>
>> +1.  I would not make this change unless we have to force an initdb
>> anyway.  And I really hope we don't, because I'm sort of hoping the
>> next 9.0 release will be rc1.
>
> Hm?  I don't think that an initdb here would have any impact on whether
> we can call the next drop RC1 or not.  We're talking about removing a
> single built-in entry in pg_proc --- it's one of the safest changes we
> could possibly make.

Great, I was afraid people would want another beta if we forced an
initdb. So a hearty +1 for fixing it and not doing another beta
(pending other bugs obviously).