| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
| Date: | 2010-08-04 20:02:43 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=bH5Q=UxAE10oa4Yg=w2VpwRK1MU5NVi89OpX3@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 4 August 2010 20:58, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Great, I was afraid people would want another beta if we forced an
>> initdb. So a hearty +1 for fixing it and not doing another beta
>> (pending other bugs obviously).
>
> And, btw, there has been a lot of testing of pg_upgrade due to the
> initdbs and otherwise. I think 9.0 is going to have a pretty darned
> solid pg_upgrade because of it.
>
Leave my name off the commit comment then ;) People who have been
waiting for this will burn me as a heretical witch... er.. man
witch... warlock?
--
Thom Brown
Registered Linux user: #516935
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2010-08-04 20:28:13 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-08-04 19:58:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-04 20:07:38 | Re: more numeric stuff |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-08-04 19:58:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |