From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: linux server configuration |
Date: | 2011-01-06 13:39:51 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=_RLF_se2NLcD110gvO+rbe8VCpTpvKKVO6+=F@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I don't think that it makes sense to look at PG tuning and server
tuning as two separate tasks. XFS was recently benchmarked using
bonnie++ by Greg Smith, with interesting results:
http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/en/2010/04/the-return-of-xfs-on-linux.html
That said, my guess is that the majority of large Linux installations
are using ext3 or ext4. It isn't the case that there's a favoured
filesystem for Postgres.
The kernel parameters that you'll want to change are sysV IPC parameters:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/kernel-resources.html
If you want a guide to choosing hardware for Postgres, I can highly
recommend Greg Smith's new book, "Postgresql 9 High performance".
--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Birta Levente | 2011-01-06 13:58:13 | pg_dump and database size question |
Previous Message | Sim Zacks | 2011-01-06 11:20:54 | linux server configuration |