| From: | Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How about synchronous notifications? |
| Date: | 2010-09-22 18:58:07 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=Zh5aX3aES=7XNKzJNc0eDS-xrG214o7LVixgZ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> wrote:
> Given these issues I guess it would be easier to use a separate messaging
> server (despite that still not being that easy :) ). This would have the
> characteristic of not being DB specific, so apps wouldn't be locked in to
> postgresql. Whether this is a benefit or not depends on your POV ;).
>
The AMQP protocol seems to be the way to go for messaging, if that's
where you're heading. If you're not stuck to any legacy, then you
should go where the world is aiming. The only drawback is the
maturity of the tools, but that improves daily.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nils O. Selåsdal | 2010-09-22 19:52:03 | Can psql show the column type of a result ? |
| Previous Message | Francisco Reyes | 2010-09-22 17:48:21 | Re: Kill -9 for a session process caused all the sessions to be killed |