From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: knngist - 0.8 |
Date: | 2010-10-15 21:35:17 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=Xw6PDg-rp_O+yksQQoSjTjRLHrLzoDm=pegRy@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> BTW, have we discussed the idea of embedding the role in the strategy
> number? For example, require regular operators to have strategy
> numbers 1-9999, while ordering operators have numbers 10000-19999,
> leaving room for a couple more roles before we have to rethink the
> assignment or widen amopstrategy to an int. That's a bit ugly but
> might be better than adding a separate role column.
Yeah, we talked about it.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg01075.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg01079.php
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-15 21:42:41 | Re: string function - "format" function proposal |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-15 21:32:13 | Re: Git migration deadline for Buildfarm |