From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "French, Martin" <frenchm(at)cromwell(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Bradley Holbrook <operations_bradley(at)servillian(dot)ca>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres Backup Utility |
Date: | 2011-01-20 16:21:09 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=Sx8GvOz+DGNarMxpXrdktg8YWvLb0y2c2Ekd5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:00 AM, French, Martin <frenchm(at)cromwell(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
>
>> Personally, I'd rather
>> not go trawling through what can only be described as hundreds of
>> thousands of lines of PostgreSQL log to find THE RIGHT DDL statements.
>
> Oh that's easy. Grep out the statements that start with alter etc,
> ptu them all in a big email, send them to all the developers and tell
> them to let you know which ones need applying to QA / Staging / etc.
> Can't get your DDL to the DBA? Your code won't work. You break the
> build because of that, you get to fix it.
Note that I also mentioned turning on logging JUST ddl statements.
Assumiing you're not logging EVERYTHING in development (and why would
you) you should only have a few dozen lines of log to grep, and little
or none of it will be things other than DDL.
--
To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | CS DBA | 2011-01-20 16:53:02 | State of multi-master replication options |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-01-20 15:46:04 | Re: Postgres Backup Utility |