Re: proposal: auxiliary functions for record type

Hey Pavel,

Everything looks fine, but I propose you to add record_set_field
just for convenience and as opposite of record_get_field.

2010/12/11 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>

> Hello
>
> I wrote a few functions for record type - record_expand,
> record_get_fields, record_get_field, record_set_fields.
>
> A usage of this functions is described in my blog
> http://okbob.blogspot.com/2010/12/iteration-over-record-in-plpgsql.html
>
> Do you think, so these functions can be in core? These are relative
> strong and enough general with zero dependency. Sure, these functions
> are not defined in ANSI SQL.
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel Stehule
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

--
// Dmitriy.