From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Streaming a base backup from master |
Date: | 2010-09-03 11:32:51 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=Rx1xO3sD8sAJUQLYLbug58ouy2b8GcL-dvMGx@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3 September 2010 12:30, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 13:25, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 3 September 2010 12:19, Heikki Linnakangas
>> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>> TODO:
>>>
>>> * We need a smarter way to do pg_start/stop_backup() with this. At the
>>> moment, you can only have one backup running at a time, but we shouldn't
>>> have that limitation with this built-in mechanism.
>>
>> Would it be possible to not require pg_start/stop_backup() for this
>> new feature? (yes, I'm probably missing something obvious here)
>
> You don't need to run it *manually*, but the process needs to run it
> automatically in the background for you. Which it does already in the
> suggested patch.
Ah, clearly I didn't read the patch in any detail. Thanks :)
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-09-03 11:43:49 | Re: Streaming a base backup from master |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-09-03 11:30:04 | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |