Re: Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with Visual C++

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Esteban Zimanyi <estebanzimanyi(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with Visual C++
Date: 2010-09-28 03:33:19
Message-ID: AANLkTi=Q6Ln5Vkxq0f+r22_g9ok_udNVCSY1P4drtY=2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> If we do so, many PGDLLEXPORT will be added:
>>>  *  17 in src/tutorial
>>>  * 507 in contrib
>>> for each exported PGFunction, _PG_init, and _PG_fini.
>>
>> Oh - I didn't realize this meant marking lots of things in contrib
>> that didn't otherwise need to be marked.  Why do other people need
>> this if we don't?
>
> As I mentioned, we don't need the marks in our build environment at all.

Why not?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2010-09-28 03:37:09 Re: Perf regression in 2.6.32 (Ubuntu 10.04 LTS)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-09-28 03:30:48 Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet