From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
Cc: | Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: hstores in pl/python |
Date: | 2010-12-13 08:07:23 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=Lant10YnG1JsZ_ZKcXhnjtA+N00cecJqJtAqk@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
this is little bit offtopic, sorry.
I am thinking, so we need a standard associative array support in core
- like Perl, Python or Javascript. So, I don't think, so migration of
hstore to core is good idea.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2010/12/13 Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>:
> It would be cool to be able to transparently use hstores as Python
> dictionaries and vice versa. It would be easy enough with hstore as a
> core type, but with hstore as an addon it's not that easy.
>
> There was talk about including hstore in core, is there still chance for
> that to happen in 9.1? I'd like to include hstore<->dict handling, but
> with hstore out-of-core the only half-sane way I see is:
> * hack PL/Python's makefile to add -Icontrib/hstore (yuck!)
> * create an extension module for Python that knows how to handle
> hstores that would live next to plpython.so
> * install it in $libdir on make install
> * when PL/Python receives or is asked to create an hstore, load the
> extension module and use it to parse the value (ugly, probably slow)
> * the module would also have to make sure hstore.so is loaded in the
> database, which in itself is not pretty, as it would refer to
> hstore_in/out symbols
>
> I wrote a module that can be used with current PL/Python to simplify
> hstore handling (https://github.com/wulczer/pyhstore) but it suffers
> from most of the aforementioned problems, and on top of that you get
> hstore->text->dict instead of just hstore->dict, which sucks.
>
> Cheers,
> Jan
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-12-13 08:19:46 | Re: Instrument checkpoint sync calls |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-12-13 08:01:29 | Re: pg_archivecleanup should remove WAL files also in pg_xlog? |