Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas
Date: 2010-09-18 22:35:51
Message-ID: AANLkTi=KJFR_KogB4NF7zSGkAJbA7bz_K9eO=YyZ6b+V@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> This is at least inconsistent and at worst wildly misleading.  ISTM
> we ought to adopt some combination of the following ideas:

I vote for this combination:

> 3. Don't show either pg_temp_nn or pg_toast_temp_nn schemas, not even
> for the current backend.

and

> With any of 1-3 we could also consider adding a rule that \dn+
> doesn't hide them.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-09-18 23:08:45 Re: Configuring synchronous replication
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-09-18 22:20:47 Re: Configuring synchronous replication