| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: FPI |
| Date: | 2011-01-28 19:11:52 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=Jm=p256etktLcPjNnYEgCHQMoJVZSUhYtK2ii@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Say what? A heap deletion compacts the page --- it will certainly fail
>>> badly on torn-page.
>
>> What do you mean by "compacts the page"? I would interpret that to
>> mean "reclaims the space formerly used by the tuple being deleted",
>> but it certainly can't do that.
>
> Oh, I'm sorry, I was confusing the case with vacuum cleanup. Obviously
> hadn't consumed any caffeine yet. Nevermind ...
OK. You had me worried for a minute there. :-)
Any substantive comments, besides the obvious "this is not 9.1 material"?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-01-28 19:12:05 | mingw format warnings |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-28 19:09:15 | Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql |