From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: changing MyDatabaseId |
Date: | 2010-11-15 13:09:12 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=H3040BOZQnz3djeuW51QQAWTC=B6DoV8Fp5nx@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Looking through the code, it appears to me that we'd need to do the
>> following (not necessarily in this order):
>
> Don't forget
>
> 9. Unload loadable modules that do not exist according to the new
> database's catalogs; eg we don't want postgis trying to run when
> its supporting tables don't exist in the selected database.
I might be missing something here, but I wasn't aware that the
catalogs had any say in what loadable modules exist. Obviously their
contents will determine whether such loadable modules ever get invoked
as a result of actions at the SQL level, but if they don't it may not
matter much that they're loaded but idle.
> 10. Somehow persuade remaining loadable modules to discard whatever
> state they have that might be database-local.
Ouch.
> We don't have workable APIs for either of those operations ATM.
Somewhat independently of this problem, it would be nice to be able to
unload a loadable module, and I think that we currently don't support
that at all. One thing (the only thing?) that makes that a
show-stopper is that the way we manage hook function chaining makes it
impossible for a module to reliably unload itself. If you load both
auto_explain and pg_stat_statements, for example, you end up with a
tangle of pointers that can't be easily unwound. I don't have a real
clear idea how to fix it, but the status quo certainly doesn't seem
optimal.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-15 13:22:32 | Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-11-15 12:56:17 | Re: changing MyDatabaseId |