From: | bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kurt Westerfeld <kwesterfeld(at)novell(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Date Parameter To Query Confusing Optimizer |
Date: | 2011-01-03 23:54:53 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=DhjDzkfskaDHxx=HmFBQSqtg3zPpsVW22mcDx@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Kurt Westerfeld <kwesterfeld(at)novell(dot)com> wrote:
> I have a JDBC-based application which passes date/time parameters using JDBC
> query parameters, which is performing very badly (ie. doing full table
> scans). In an effort to try to narrow down the problem, I am taking the
> query and running it in interactive SQL mode, but changing the date
> parameters (which are BETWEEN ? and ? clauses) and placing a date literal
> instead, using the "date '2011-01-01' syntax. When I do this, the query
> runs instantly, obviously using indices on the tables involved.
Try using PREPARE to simulate your issue. We ran into a similar issue
using PHP and prepared statements, where the plan choices were
occasionally abysmal depending what the filters were and their
relative distributions within the table.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/sql-prepare.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2011-01-03 23:56:40 | Re: Shit happens |
Previous Message | Alexander Farber | 2011-01-03 22:52:37 | Re: Merging 2 rows in a table |