Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Date: 2011-02-09 18:56:51
Message-ID: AANLkTi=DQPOJOuHnt-31gLwWQo1F4NULATMrW1eG3HQL@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:32 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Frankly, I think you should surrender some of those 14 and cajole some other folks to take on more.
>>
>> Happily...  only trouble is, I suck at cajoling.  Even my begging is
>> distinctly sub-par.
>>
>> Pleeeeeeeease?
>
> Try this:
>
> “Listen up, bitches! I'm tired of Tom and me having to do all the work. All of you who submitted patches need to review some other patches! If you haven't submitted a review for someone else's patch by commitfest end, your patches will be marked "returned."”
>
> Then maybe cuff Jeff or Alvaro or someone, to show you mean business.

That tends not to get a lot of community support, and it isn't my
intention anyway. We actually do not need to impose a draconian rule;
we just need everyone to put in a little extra effort to get us over
the hump.

But speaking of that, I just so happen to notice you haven't signed up
to review any patches this CF. How about grabbing one or two?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-02-09 19:01:37 Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-09 18:53:38 Re: git commitmessages url format change