From: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger |
Date: | 2010-11-02 00:40:00 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=BK6FGvLRpMrC1uZw8hTFACKzn1hgTDGUs_Vr3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 16:59, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Speaking of which, pltcl stores the trigger reloid instead of a flag
>> (it also uses tg_reloid in the internal proname). It seems a tad
>> excessive to have one function *per* trigger table.
>
> Surely, removing the internal name's dependency on the istrigger flag is
> wrong. If you're going to maintain separate hash entries at the pltcl
> level, why would you want to risk collisions underneath that?
Good catch. I was basing it off plperl which uses the same proname
for both (sprintf(subname, %s__%u", prodesc->proname, fn_oid)). Its
OK for plperl because when we compile we save a reference to it and
use that directly (more or less). The name does not really matter.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pltcl_rm_tgrelod_key_v2.patch | text/x-patch | 3.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2010-11-02 00:44:29 | Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2010-11-02 00:37:43 | Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons |