| From: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jbq(at)caraldi(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in plpython's Python Generators |
| Date: | 2010-11-14 18:07:44 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=Ai6dioMPWaBcZCoRWkMgF4Gq=uQCaX9NL1UrG@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 01:32, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> wrote:
> The error handling in plpython is well-known to be a mess, hence the
> confusing error message that OP got. Another annoying thing is that SPI
> calls are not done in a subtransaction, which means you can't trap
> errors with a try/catch Python construct. I'm currently trying to get
> try/catch to work and might end up cleaning up error handling as well...
> but this can take me some time, so maybe someone should plug this
> particular hole right away.
While on this topic, maybe you can chime in on the pgsql-docs list for
my documentation patches to document the current (broken) behavior?
Regards,
Marti
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-11-14 18:12:32 | Re: HOT updates in index-less tables |
| Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2010-11-14 18:07:22 | Re: wCTE behaviour |