| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |
| Date: | 2010-10-07 02:01:20 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=AfTAwMv=WXdZeLzY0NNBZ1sJHDsDK+wmRMcVS@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> Hey, I didn't know about those. That sounds like it might be worth
>> investigating, though I confess I lack a 48-core machine on which to
>> measure the alleged benefit.
>
> I've got a couple 24-core systems, if it'd be sufficiently useful to
> test with..
It's good to be you.
I don't suppose you could try to replicate the lseek() contention?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-10-07 02:07:07 | Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-10-07 01:30:12 | Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-10-07 02:07:07 | Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-10-07 01:30:12 | Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |