| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3 |
| Date: | 2011-02-04 14:53:15 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=90G21FZfbFLi-fHpNZaB_WozxZdWi3FNnRZ2E@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> So every package would include a script called upgrade.sql ( or
> upgrade.c? ) which is supposed to handle the upgrade, and it's up to the
> module author to power that, at least until 9.2? Seem like the most
> reasonable course for February ...
I don't think we should commit something that for 9.1 that we may need
to change incompatibly for 9.2. If we're not completely happy with
it, it gets booted. Whatever we put in place here is going to be with
us for a long, long time.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nick Lello | 2011-02-04 14:55:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2011-02-04 14:52:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |